The article said that Spears had given the tape to lawyers on September 30 and that she and Federline were "acting goofy the whole time" while watching it. To wit, if someone was separating from a major music star who is poised for a big comeback, it is quite likely that any little secrets they had about naughty sexual romps, particularly if captured on video tape, could instill some "fear" in a star who didn't want the world to know about these kinds of exploits. Well, under the California Penal Code , it means the following: That leads me to believe the tape may not exist since I can't imagine someone being this dumb. The suit has nothing to do with the recent avalanche of stories questioning her marriage, though — it's over a report that she and Federline made a sex tape and were worried that it would be leaked. Spears has been a staple of Us coverage since marrying former dancer and aspiring rapper Federline, with whom she had her first child, Sean Preston, in September. To expose any secret affecting him or them. For the record- both Brit and K-Fed have previously denied in sworn court documents no less that a sex tape featuring the two of them does not exist. I look to legal concepts here not to accuse anyone of anything, since we don't know all the facts, but simply to provide one framework to view this type of alleged behavior.

Britney spears real sex tapes


Spears has been a staple of Us coverage since marrying former dancer and aspiring rapper Federline, with whom she had her first child, Sean Preston, in September. Though she gave rival People magazine access to photos of her wedding and Sean's birth see "Britney Baby Photos To Appear In People" , she criticized Us in February after the magazine published pictures of her October honeymoon in the Fiji Islands taken by resort staff members. Internet posts about an alleged Britney Spears and Kevin Federline sex tape are nothing new. Or, if it does exist, I can't imagine someone being simple-minded enough to use it to obtain more money in such a high profile split. For the record- both Brit and K-Fed have previously denied in sworn court documents no less that a sex tape featuring the two of them does not exist. I'll leave that one for you to answer for yourself. But, the "story" has moved beyond obscure blog sites and message boards onto the digital pages of the Philadelphia Daily News. Until you face what is going on in your life, I guess you'll remain a false tabloid. It also asks for unspecified punitive damages. I look to legal concepts here not to accuse anyone of anything, since we don't know all the facts, but simply to provide one framework to view this type of alleged behavior. Now, is it possible that someone is dumb enough to publicly act in a way that brings into question the criminal penal code? To accuse the individual threatened, or any relative of his, or member of his family, of any crime; or, 3. Well, under the California Penal Code , it means the following: To do an unlawful injury to the person or property of the individual threatened or of a third person; or, 2. Spokespeople for Us and Spears could not be reached for comment at press time. A person could be found guilty of extortion by obtaining the property of another for example, money by wrongful use of fear caused from threats of exposing "disgrace" or "any secret" about the person who is handing over the property to avoid the exposure. The article said that Spears had given the tape to lawyers on September 30 and that she and Federline were "acting goofy the whole time" while watching it. The suit has nothing to do with the recent avalanche of stories questioning her marriage, though — it's over a report that she and Federline made a sex tape and were worried that it would be leaked. But, what does it really mean? According to the suit, Spears went to court after Us refused her request for a retraction, saying it stood by the story. This whole affair reminded me of my law school days and in particular a legal theory called "extortion. Then again, maybe there is someone out there this dumb. So, basically, if I were to say to someone "give me money" or I'll tell the world about your secret, whether that secret is a "disgraceful" one or not, I could be found guilty of extortion and sent to jail. That leads me to believe the tape may not exist since I can't imagine someone being this dumb. To expose any secret affecting him or them. New parents have a new worry:

Britney spears real sex tapes

Video about britney spears real sex tapes:

Britney Spears - Womanizer (Dsont XXX Remix)





SyntaxTextGen not activated

Britney spears real sex tapes

4 thoughts on “Britney spears real sex tapes

  • JoJotaur
    04.07.2018 at 23:59
    Permalink

    Though she gave rival People magazine access to photos of her wedding and Sean's birth see "Britney Baby Photos To Appear In People" , she criticized Us in February after the magazine published pictures of her October honeymoon in the Fiji Islands taken by resort staff members. Now, nothing in the legal world is ever "cut and dry" -- but it doesn't take a rocket scientist or a lawyer!

    Reply
  • Voodoonos
    12.07.2018 at 11:56
    Permalink

    Then again, maybe there is someone out there this dumb.

    Reply
  • Mezizragore
    22.07.2018 at 03:50
    Permalink

    The suit has nothing to do with the recent avalanche of stories questioning her marriage, though — it's over a report that she and Federline made a sex tape and were worried that it would be leaked.

    Reply
  • Goltira
    25.07.2018 at 05:10
    Permalink

    To wit, if someone was separating from a major music star who is poised for a big comeback, it is quite likely that any little secrets they had about naughty sexual romps, particularly if captured on video tape, could instill some "fear" in a star who didn't want the world to know about these kinds of exploits.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3278-3279-3280-3281-3282-3283-3284-3285-3286-3287-3288-3289-3290-3291-3292-3293-3294-3295-3296-3297-3298-3299-3300-3301-3302-3303-3304-3305-3306-3307
Sitemap